WOMEN AS TERRORISTS
"Men are more naturally lured into terrorism by promises of power and glory" (Deborah Galvin)
There are more unanswered questions in this area than probably any other topic in terrorism studies. Stereotypes, controversies, and myths are abundant (Talbot 2001). It would be nice if the research literature were settled on this topic, but it is not. It is not even settled in the field of criminology, where advanced study of female crime has been relatively stalled for decades. There is hope and urgency, however, for at least some emerging consensus. After all, women have long been involved in terrorist movements in significant numbers. During the 1970s and 1980s, many were prominently active in Latin American and European terrorist organizations. Many groups had a disproportionate number of women, such as the Red Army Faction and its sister organization, the Second of June Movement. Women have also been central figures in Sri Lanka's Tamil Tigers, Italy's Red Brigades, Spain's Basque ETA, the Japanese Red Army, Chechen terrorism, Middle Eastern and African terrorism. In fact, only 80% of terrorist operations in the late 20th century were led and executed by men, while the remaining 20% had female combatants or leaders (Russell & Miller, 1983:50).
There is evidence to suggest that women are more frequently involved in domestic terrorism than international terrorism. No good estimates of numbers exist, but in United States history, women have been very prominently involved in organizations like the Ku Klux Klan, the Weather Underground, the Black Panthers, and the American Nazi Movement. In fact, if we categorize a new type of terrorism, called "racial terrorism" as Blee (2005) defines it, we find women represented in large numbers, and increasing their numbers annually. Cunningham (2003) and Blazak (2004) come to the same conclusion about this alarming trend. Racial terrorism is usually called organized hate crime, but as a type of terrorism, it is defined as follows:
"Racial terrorism is terrorism undertaken by members of an organized White supremacist or pro-Aryan group against racial minorities to advance racial agendas" (Blee 2005)
Photographic records of old 19th century and early 20th century lynchings show large numbers of women hanging around, often with children, and often laughing and smiling with glee. While there is no direct evidence of them actually lynching somebody, it is safe to assume that they played key roles, like for example, participating in the Klan's strategy of spreading vicious rumors about Black men, Catholic schoolteachers, and Jewish merchants. Other roles that women play in racial terrorism include the following:
acting as getaway drivers or safe house custodians
smuggling contraband into men in prison
instigating spontaneous assaults and murders
building and transporting crosses for burning
creating a more benign image for the movement
keeping secrets and not becoming police informants
However, rumor-mongering appears to be the number one, favorite activity of women terrorists. Blee's (2005) research zeroes in on this behavior by making a distinction between "strategic" and "narrative" involvement. The distinction has more to do with who is rumored more as the true enemy, the state or racial minorities. With strategic involvement, the violence is planned and focused on precise targets. With narrative involvement, victims are chosen randomly. The research results are as follows:
Clearly, women terrorists are more comfortable spreading rumors about racial minorities than engaging in conspiracy-talk about the state. Even when women do talk about Jewish cabals and/or New World Order conspiracies, they have a tendency to "personalize" it in some way and try to identify the enemy by name. This may be because they are better researchers, but it is more likely they defer to men for the abstract thought and to keep an eye on the "big picture." Alternatively, it may be because the female mindset is just more nominalistic or particularistic, preferring to put a "face" on the enemy. Either way, this has enormous implications for the role of women in terrorist target selection.
Women terrorists have had crucial impacts on history. For example, the assassination of Czar Alexander II in 1881 was organized by a woman, and many nineteenth-century revolutionaries were female. More than half the suicide bombers seen around the world since 2002 have been women. In places like Chechnya and Sri Lanka, women constitute at least 30 percent of the fighting force, and by current estimates, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade counts over 300 women in its special unit of highly trained female suicide bombers. Terrorist groups around the world actively seek women converts (from other ethnicities) because such people can carry European passports and evade most profiles. It is clear that women have been involved with terrorism for a long time. What motivates their long-standing and recent involvement?
IS IT LIBERATING?
One hypothesis claims that terrorism is somehow liberating for women. This is probably not true. In point of fact, only three terrorist groups (the German RAF, the Red Brigades in Italy and the Shining Path in Peru) were strongly committed to the cause of women's liberation and/or gender equality. Two women in particular, Ulrike Meinhof of the German RAF and August La Torre Guzman of the Shining Path, are identified by Griset & Mahon (2003) as being instrumental in developing group ideologies that included women. On the other hand, Islamist groups aren't known for their sensitivity to women's liberation, and in fact, Bloom (2005) reports that Islamic women who join terrorist groups because the "enemy" raped someone they know stand a good chance of being raped by their fellow terrorists, along with being used as "cannon fodder." It may be that female terrorists are standing up for their gender in some way, while simultaneously making a statement in other ways, but the reality is much more likely to involve patriarchal exploitation than female liberation. One reason why terrorists seek to use women martyrs is to shame more men into joining the cause. It always seems to be that male purposes dominate. For these reasons, and many more, it may well be that terrorism will always remain a man's sport. However, the times are changing.
Cragin & Daly (2009) make the case that women are essential to modern terrorist movements. They serve a psychological function of promoting the terrorist ethos. They do this as recruiters and nurturers of male terrorists (who dominate the ranks of those getting killed), and hence, even as widows and orphans, they serve a valuable purposes. In sum, they "galvanize" a terrorist movement. However, what do we make of female suicide bombers? Surely, they have a different purpose. Probably the best study on this subject is by Speckhard & Ahkmedova (2006), who argue the true purpose is to dominate political discourse. Their psycho-social analysis of Chechen female suicide terrorists found nothing like the "cult of martyrdom" other researchers have found in Palestine (Victor 2003). The Chechen approach involves making songs and pre-event videos for release to the general public after the terrorist attack. The Palestinian approach involves making martyrdom videos for distribution to Palestinian audiences only. While certainly those who embrace martyrdom have a religious component, a political component (liberation or social justice?) may be more prevalent among the motivations for Chechen female terrorism. Speckhard & Ahkmedova (2006) even speculate about a motivation involving "survivor guilt." This is interesting because it suggests that in war-torn, traumatized regions, women feel "dirty, contaminated, or guilty" about having survived, and becoming a suicide bomber can be seen as some sort of "cleansing ritual." There's also a practical, pragmatic aspect (possibly liberating) in the decision over choosing to die versus being killed. In other words, the liberation element may boil down to nothing more than the opportunity to do something active rather than passive. Bloom (2005) makes a similar point that the strongest feminist element may be in the decision to "do something" rather than sit cooped up at home with children.
IS IT EXCITING?
One of the things related to the idea of liberation is equity, especially occupational equity. Women have to fight constantly for recognition they are equivalent (or possibly better) than men. Occupational equity involves the element of excitement in the tension between aspirations and achievements. While many women aspire to be all they can be, only a few make it to their desired points of achievement. In standard criminological theory (Liska 1971), men are the ones who usually turn to crime because they don't reach their desired points of achievement. Women, however, react differently from men in terms of such frustration. I know this will sound offensive, but frankly, women are more capable of accepting dull, average lives. In more flattering terms, they avoid become double-losers by adding a criminal career to a boring occupational career. The women who turn to crime, therefore, don't tend to come from the ranks of losers. They come from the ranks of winners. They are what criminologists call "able" criminals -- smart, proficient, versatile, and eager to learn. If their excitement can be channeled toward terrorism, it is entirely possible that women will become the more proficient terrorists.
|In many cases, terrorists have found that some women respond well to military training. It's unknown how well the nuns (far right) can shoot, but the female members of Hamas, PIJ, and Fatah (near right) are excellent sharpshooters. Clearly the more exciting and prestigious position for women is to carry a gun, as opposed to the less fit women who usually only get to throw grenades or wear suicide belts. Waiting lists are reportedly long for the summer camps set up all over the Gaza strip (and elsewhere around the world) for terrorism groups to send their best female recruits for training. Nobody knows exactly how sophisticated is such training, but the mind boggles at what terrorist tactics they might carry out.|
The YouTube video at left shows the Iranian response to America's decision to allow women in combat (circa 2013). They are training and hand-picking a force of 3500 Iranian women to become ninja assassins. They are very serious about this, and presumably are being created for homeland security purposes. Trying out to become an Iranian female ninja is all the rage among young Iranian women. Time will tell if Iran can refrain from sending these trained assassins overseas. After all, Iran does have a reputation for being the world's number one exporter of terrorism. They could very well corner the market at exporting female terrorism.
IS IT SEXY?
A interesting variation of the female liberation approach is the sexual liberation thesis, which when applied to female terrorism means that the work of being a female terrorist is somehow inherently sexy or at least has sexual overtones in terms of the presumed sexual superiority of women over men. The article Sexy, Tough, or Inept? examines this "sexy babe with issues" hypothesis, and finds the common stereotype to derive from British fiction, where a typical, sexy, Irish, female terrorist seduces a British soldier and then kills him, the idea of dying at the hands of a gorgeous woman being perceived as the ultimate good time. In the U.S., two violent 1970s groups came close to helping realize these perceptions among the American audience with two American versions of "sexy" female terrorists (pictured below): the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) with its iconic Patty Hearst; and the Weathermen, with its female leader, Bernardine Dohrn.
"Sexy" American Female Terrorists
With the above two examples, Patty Hearst was presumably brainwashed, and it is unknown how much the quest for gender equality motivated Bernardine Dohrn, and likewise, how much her looks helped make her a leader. It may be that the mug shot played into public sympathy in some way (it was kind of like a recruitment poster for left-wing causes back in those days). Bernardine Dohrn is now an unrepentant law professor married to another former Weatherman leader, Bill Ayers, and the couple are close friends of President Barack Obama. Now at 70 years old (Patty Hearst is 12 years younger), Dohrn is probably more flattered than Hearst in being considered a "sexy female terrorist." Both women seem to have held their looks well, however.
Granted, the American experience is limited. There are no Marilyn Monroe types. It might be worthwhile to examine non-American female terrorists for purposes of examining the "sexiness" factor. The Red Army Faction (mentioned above), might quality for a good case study in this regard, since many regard them as having some of the world's most beautiful terrorists (visit Baader-Meinhof.com). Trnka (2007) analyzes the RAF in some detail, from a gendered perspective, noting Gudren Ensslin and second-generation member Margrit Schiller were the real "sexual revolutionaries" in the group, rather than the namesake, Ulrike Meinhof. Apparently, the "sexual" aspect of terrorism is a little rough, the favorite read of Ensslin being Marquis de Sade's Josephine. The Baader-Meinhof gang was known, among other things, for their sex-and-drugs indoctrination of followers. Another heavy sexualized group (based on indoctrination more by sex than sex-and-drugs) is the Japanese Red Army, led by female leader Fusako Shigenobu (pictured below along with her followers).
"Sexy" Non-American Female Terrorists
Known internationally as the "Modern Mata Hari," the "Red Queen of Terror," and/or the "Most Feared Female Terrorist," Fusako Shigenobu is indisputably the world's most beautiful terrorist. She was strikingly beautiful in her youth, and worked her way up out of poverty by being a topless dancer. She was also quite ruthless, once having one of her female followers murdered for becoming pregnant and/or passing a napkin the wrong way. Her group, the JRA, was quite successful at raising ransom money and arming themselves throughout the 1970s and 1980s, and they were the only group prior to al-Qaeda to launch an attack against the U.S. on U.S. soil. She is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence after finally getting caught in 2001. Her life story is the inspiration behind the Kill Bill movie series where Lucy Liu plays her as the character O-Ren.
The three "lethal beauties" above are Elana Henao Beatriz, Sandra Avila Beltran, and Rosalie Garcia. All three have been on Interpol's Top Ten list of wanted, international criminals. They are the three most powerful women in the international drug trade. Beatriz is the supplier for the Sinaloa Cartel, and is probably the smartest of the bunch, being a college graduate in political science and able to speak four languages. Beltran is known as Queen of the Pacific, and has a Wikipedia page. Garcia was the head of a deadly heroin ring in the Bronx throughout the 1990s. All three are known for their ability to use and manipulate men.
IS IT FASCINATING?
Female terrorists are definitely fascinating. Besides the sexual mystique of female terrorism, there is also a certain public fear and insecurity that surrounds their mystique. Terrorist groups know this, and use it for psychological advantage, but the sexual allure seems to be co-mingled with the newsworthiness. MacDonald (2001:19) argues that "not only do such women take on a masculine role; aggressive, predatory, and political; they also appear to become more attractive as women by doing so." Three cases in particular resulted in the terrorist becoming a world sex symbol: (1) Leila Khaled, the Palestinian hijacker who became a media darling; (2) Ulrike Meinhof, of the West German RAF, who was mourned by thousands of followers after her funeral in 1976; and (3) Magdalena Kopp, wife and lover of Carlos the Jackal. Female terrorists not only make good media spokespersons, but terrorist groups know that operations carried out by women will garner extensive media coverage. Use of women in terrorism also helps to make the group look less evil. Gender alone is enough to evoke public sympathy. As Nacos (2007) puts it, the use of female terrorism makes terrorism look like it was caused for love. Khaled, Meinhoff, and Kopp each represent nothing more than international poster children for terrorism, especially in the Middle East and Europe. Take a look at the following pictures of them, and ask yourself if you think they are drop-dead gorgeous or what? The Khaled photo is actually one of the most-adored photos in the Middle East, found on the bedroom wall of many Palestinian boys. The Meinhoff photo, likewise, is adored by many revolutionaries in Europe. The Kopp photo is actually a good look-alike actress who played her part in the movie, Carlos. As poster girls, they are emblematic or archetypal of a movement, cause, ideal, or circumstance, but they are more than that.
The Poster Girls of Female Terrorism
They are gorgeous because the media has conditioned our aesthetics or sense of beauty. The media has also conditioned us into pseudo-knowledge about female terrorism because it is confused about terrorism in general. The new media (like YouTube) has deluded us into thinking better knowledge can be derived from sharing video and pictures with a wider topography of audience. It is a war of aesthetics and personal taste. It is likely that female terrorism will become more of a media issue in years to come. There is market demand for female terrorism. It is likely that female terrorism will proliferate in some media-mediated fashion. Who knows what the future of female terrorism holds? Who will be the next icon? Who knows who will be the next poster girl?
IS IT MORE RUTHLESS?
Not likely, but who knows? Although the "natural born killer" and "sneakiness" thesis have long been abandoned in criminology, there is still frequent resurgence of the idea that women are less moral and more ruthless somehow. Women who do bad things must be bad women, it is frequently assumed. Galvin (1983), however, thinks that it's all a myth, for example, stating that female terrorists have almost uniformly been portrayed as "more violent, ruthless and uncompromising than their male counterparts." Holding the position that it's not a myth is Laqueur (1999:38), who argues that women are more fanatical and have a greater capacity for seeing other people suffer. Anecdotal evidence can be found, such as the British experience in the Irish conflict or the German experience in battling the RAF, where MacDonald (2001) points out that women fought more courageously than men. They stood their ground, often firing their automatic weapons in a more unflinching manner.
Stack-O'Connor's (2007) examination of the first modern woman terrorist (Vera Zasulich) offers a glimpse into a common personality characteristic which may be a defining feature of female terrorism. It includes being unconcerned for normal manners and courtesy. Based on such observations, it might be said that female terrorists lack the social skills to get along in polite company. Whether or not this makes them immoral is another matter. Whether or not it makes them ruthless is out of the question. The "bad mother" or "irredeemable adulteress" story is usually something concocted by counterterrorism authorities to play down the martyrdom aspect when a female terrorist gets killed or imprisoned. If not being able to get along in polite company is a hallmark of female terrorism, then what about their ability to get along in impolite company? A case is point might be the ETA, which has cultivated good relationships with other terrorist groups around the world (e.g., IRA, FARC) primarily through the efforts of its female members and leaders.
The Female Leaders of ETA (Basque Separatists)
Pictured at left are Iratxe Sorzabal (head of the "political machine") and Izaskun Lesaka (head of the "military machine"). The political machine is in charge of propaganda, paraphernalia, hoods, banners, emblems, and so forth, while the military machine is in charge of caches of arms and explosives. The ETA is no stranger of female leadership, as Basque culture (neither French nor Spanish) has long been matriarchal and has given females a strong influence in domestic affairs. Only in recent years, however, have females risen to top leadership positions, however. The group has been around since 1959, killed or kidnapped thousands of victims, and has over 700 political prisoners incarcerated. Extortion and a "revolutionary tax" are their main sources of funds. They are known for on-again, off-again cease-fires, as well as widespread fluctuations in their popular support (sometimes the public loves them, and sometimes hates them). French authorities are slightly more lenient with them than Spanish authorities.
IS THERE A RIGHT-WING/LEFT-WING DIFFERENCE?
It's both, about equally. Eager (2008) points out that many women terrorists have been attracted to right-wing groups, and Martin (2008) insists that many women are attracted to left-wing groups. Ethno-nationalist terrorism appears to be a common attractor for females, but so are religious movements. It may be the case that left-wing terrorism attracts more women interested in leadership positions or leadership decision-making, since those leftist groups are more likely to tolerate female leadership. Right-wing groups, on the other hand, may attract more women followers. There is usually something more hateful about right-wing groups, and sometimes, female involvement there is explained by a presumably longer sense of grievance, hate, and desire for vengeance. Studies have found that women who commit violent crimes are more likely to hold traditional/conservative views than liberal ones (Eager 2008), but there is little evidence of a greater capacity for grievance, hate, or vengeance.
It's hard to find a shortage of "Girls Gone Nazi" these days, and surely, much of it is play-acting or simply cheesecake opportunism. However, there are many female members of Nazi movements who are deadly serious. It is a matter of historical record that four female Nazi war criminals were executed after the WWI Nuremburg trials. Most of them dished out brutal treatment in the concentration camps (or ran the gas chambers). It's understood that modern neo-Nazis consider women their "secret weapon" (whatever that means, but probably refers to the shortage of white women of child-bearing age). They aren't normally allowed to hold leadership positions, but in recent years, there have been isolated outbursts of savage violence by neo-Nazi women. Germany has a constant problem with them, and in Greece during 2012, one neo-Nazi women went on a shooting spree and killed 10 random victims. Russia and Mongolia have also seen high-profile activity by neo-Nazi women. They pop up in the strangest places. Nazi girls tend to attack immigrants more than any other hated enemy, but there is also a definite anti-homosexual flavor to their temperament.
ARE THEY DUPED INTO IT?
There are limits to how far one might want to press the "feeblemindedness" or "dumb blond" thesis. According to Galvin (1983), a significant number of "women are recruited into terrorist organizations by boyfriends ... [and] a significant feature that characterizes the involvement of the female terrorist is the male or female lover/accomplice scenario." In fact, one of the most reliable predictors of a women's involvement in terrorism is her relationship to a former or current terrorist in that movement.
It is, of course, always possible that what appears to be duped behavior is actually self-directed behavior. According to experts like Yoram Schweitzer (2006) and Farhana Ali (2005), women tend to be motivated by reasons that are more "personal" than those that influence men. Mia Bloom (2005) summarizes these as the four R's: Revenge, Redemption, Respect, and Relationship, and she gives the following examples:
The loss of a loved one (usually the dominant male in their life—their husband, father, or brother)
A need to reinvent themselves because of alleged or real sexual misconduct
An inability to conceive children or being considered not marriageable
A desire to improve the status of women in their society
Proof that they are just as dedicated as the men to the Cause
Being the sisters, daughters, or wives of well-known terrorists
It is clear that a number of motivations
as well as roles exist for women in terrorism. A representative sample of
this diversity is reflected in the Griset and Mahon (2003)
typology (below) which identifies
four major roles played out by female terrorists:
(1) Sympathizers -- provide support and resources, but are not involved in particular actions
(2) Spies -- serve as decoys or messengers, though they are not usually engaged in violence
(3) Warriors -- participate in violent activities, but are not decision makers
(4) Dominant Forces -- hold leadership roles, make decisions for the group, engage in violence, and safeguard and interpret the group’s ideological stance
PATHWAYS TO LEADERSHIP
Now, clearly there is a difference between terrorist leadership and political leadership, but after all, there are only a certain number of well-known pathways for women to rise to top positions. Garance Franke-Rute, who blogs at thegarance.com gives us the rundown on these pathways (as follows). They are instructive in the sense that rising to the top of a political organization (or the head of a country) is similar to the process of rising to the top of a terrorist organization.
(1) the Outsider-Savior -- this type rises to power after some major national crisis and usually represents a platform of healing and renewal. Their rise is assisted if men have made a hash of things. Real-life examples include Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, who was elected president of Liberia in 2005 after a 14-year civil war, and Johanna Sigurdardottir, elected prime minister of Iceland in 2009 after the previous government fell to protesters. In both cases, and especially with the lesbian prime minister of Iceland, their platform included the charge that men are just genetically too violent.
(2) the Warrior-Defender -- this type has usually served in the military or in some defense minister capacity, or at the very least, is an expert in security or international affairs. Real-life examples include Michelle Bachelet, elected as the first female president of Chile in 2006, or more prototypical, the original “Iron Lady,” Golda Meir, who became prime minister of Israel in 1969.
(3) the Legacy -- this type is by far the most common pathway to leadership for women. It is the oldest and surest route. It requires that they be the widow, daughter or wife of a famous leader. Real-life examples include Hillary Rodham Clinton, Corazon Aquino of Philippines, Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan, and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner of Argentina. There are many other examples.
(4) the Party Leader -- this type consists of women who have been successful at political fund-raising, lobbying, or mass communications in terms of being a media personality. Real-life examples include Angela Merkel, who became the first female chancellor of Germany in 2005 after leading its center-right Christian Democratic Union into a larger parliamentary coalition, and Margaret Thatcher, who did something similar with the UK Conservative Pary in 1975.
Female Suicide Bombers: A Global Trend
Sexy, Tough, or Inept: Depictions of Women Terrorists in the News
Understanding Female Terrorists: An Analysis of Motivation
Women as Victims and Perpetrators of Terrorist Violence
Ali, F. (2005). "Muslim female fighters: An emerging trend," Terrorism Monitor 3(21): November 3.
Blazak, R. (2004). "Getting it: The role of women in male desistence from hate groups." Pp. 161-79 in A. Ferber (ed.) Home-grown hate: Gender and organized racism. NY: Routledge.
Bloom, M. (2005). Dying to kill: The allure of suicide terror. NY: Columbia Univ. Press.
Blee, K. (2005). "Women and organized racial terrorism in the U.S." Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(5): 421-33.
Cragin, K. & Daly, S. (2009). Women as terrorists: Mothers, recruiters, martyrs. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Cunningham, K. (2003). "Cross-regional trends in female terrorism." Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 26(3): 171-195.
Dobie, K. (1997). "Skingirl mothers: From Thelma and Louise to Ozzie and Harriet." Pp. 257-67 in A. Jetter et al. (eds.) The politics of motherhood. Hanover, NH: Univ. Press of New England.
Eager, P. (2008). From freedom fighters to terrorists: Women and political violence. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
Galvin, D. (1983). "The female terrorist: A socio- psychological perspective." Behavioral Science and the Law 1:19-32.
Graebner, W. (2008). Patty's got a gun: Patricia Hearst in 1970s America. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Griset, P. & Mahon, S. (2003). Terrorism in perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, D. (1997). Women warriors: A history. Washington, Brassey’s.
Laqueur, Walter. (1999). The new terrorism. NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
Liska, A. (1971). "Aspirations and Expectations." Sociological Quarterly 12: 99-107.
MacDonald, E. (2001). Shoot the women first. New York: Random.
Martin, G. (2008). Essentials of terrorism. Los Angeles: Sage.
Nacos, B. (2007). Mass-mediated terrorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Neuburger, L. & T. Valentini. (1998). Women and terrorism. NY: St. Martin's Press.
Russell, C. & Miller, B. (1983). "Profile of a terrorist." Pp. 45-60 in Freedman, L. & Alexander, Y. (Eds.), Perspectives on Terrorism. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
Schweitzer, Y. (Ed.) (2006). Female suicide bombers: Dying for equality? Tel Aviv: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.
Skaine, R. (2006). Female suicide bombers. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
Speckhard, A. & Ahkmedova, K. (2006). "The making of a martyr: Chechen suicide terrorism." Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29(5): 429-92. [author's website]
Stack-O'Connor, A. (2007). "Picked last: Women and terrorism." Joint Force Quarterly 44: 95-100.
Talbot, R. (2001). "Myths in the representation of women terrorists." Eire-Ireland 35(3): 165-86.
Taylor, C. (2000). "And don’t forget to clean the fridge: Women in the secret sphere of terrorism." Pp. 294-304 in DeGroot, G. & Peniston-Bird, C. (Eds.) A Soldier and a Woman. New York, Longman.
Trnka, J. (2007). "Beyond Victims and Perpetrators." Pp. 133-55 in M. Hicks & B. Keeney (eds.) Defending the Homeland. Morgantown: WV Univ. Press.
Victor, B. (2003). Army of roses: Inside the world of Palestinian women suicide bombers. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Books.
Zedalis, D. (2004) Female suicide bombers. Honolulu: Univ. Press of the Pacific.
Last updated: Mar. 03, 2013
Not an official webpage of APSU, copyright restrictions apply, see Megalinks in Criminal Justice
O'Connor, T. (2013). "Female Terrorism," MegaLinks in Criminal Justice. Retrieved from http://www.drtomoconnor.com/3400/3400lect03a.htm.